Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

address feedback on #6033 #6034

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2019
Merged

address feedback on #6033 #6034

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2019

Conversation

kuceb
Copy link
Contributor

@kuceb kuceb commented Dec 23, 2019

@kuceb kuceb requested a review from brian-mann December 23, 2019 17:52
@cypress-bot
Copy link
Contributor

cypress-bot bot commented Dec 23, 2019

Thanks for the contribution! Below are some guidelines Cypress uses when doing PR reviews.

  • Please write [WIP] in the title of your Pull Request if your PR is not ready for review - someone will review your PR as soon as the [WIP] is removed.
  • Please familiarize yourself with the PR Review Checklist and feel free to make updates on your PR based on these guidelines.

PR Review Checklist

If any of the following requirements can't be met, leave a comment in the review selecting 'Request changes', otherwise 'Approve'.

User Experience

  • The feature/bugfix is self-documenting from within the product.
  • The change provides the end user with a way to fix their problem (no dead ends).

Functionality

  • The code works and performs its intended function with the correct logic.
  • Performance has been factored in (for example, the code cleans up after itself to not cause memory leaks).
  • The code guards against edge cases and invalid input and has tests to cover it.

Maintainability

  • The code is readable (too many nested 'if's are a bad sign).
  • Names used for variables, methods, etc, clearly describe their function.
  • The code is easy to understood and there are relevant comments explaining.
  • New algorithms are documented in the code with link(s) to external docs (flowcharts, w3c, chrome, firefox).
  • There are comments containing link(s) to the addressed issue (in tests and code).

Quality

  • The change does not reimplement code.
  • There's not a module from the ecosystem that should be used instead.
  • There is no redundant or duplicate code.
  • There are no irrelevant comments left in the code.
  • Tests are testing the code’s intended functionality in the best way possible.

Internal

  • The original issue has been tagged with a release in ZenHub.

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Dec 23, 2019



Test summary

3589 0 47 0


Run details

Project cypress
Status Passed
Commit 3ebd78c
Started Dec 23, 2019 5:58 PM
Ended Dec 23, 2019 6:03 PM
Duration 04:49 💡
OS Linux Debian - 9.11
Browser Multiple

View run in Cypress Dashboard ➡️


This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Dashboard

Copy link
Member

@brian-mann brian-mann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gracias. much better

@brian-mann brian-mann merged commit 9e0f32a into develop Dec 23, 2019
@emilyrohrbough emilyrohrbough deleted the address-feedback-6033 branch August 1, 2024 13:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants