Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
150 lines (102 loc) · 5.41 KB

CONTRIBUTING.md

File metadata and controls

150 lines (102 loc) · 5.41 KB

Contributing to opentelemetry-rust

The Rust special interest group (SIG) meets regularly. See the OpenTelemetry community repo for information on this and other language SIGs.

See the public meeting notes for a summary description of past meetings. To request edit access, join the meeting or get in touch on Slack.

Pull Requests

Prerequisites

Crate opentelemetry-otlp uses gRPC + Protocol Buffers.
You can provide the protocol compiler protoc path programmatically (only works with tonic) or build it from source

export PROTOC=$(which protoc)

Prerequisites to build the protocol compiler protoc from source

  • protoc
  • cmake
  • llvm (and LIBCLANG_PATH environment variable pointing to the bin directory of LLVM install)

How to Send Pull Requests

Everyone is welcome to contribute code to opentelemetry-rust via GitHub pull requests (PRs).

$ git clone --recurse-submodule https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rust

Enter the newly created directory and add your fork as a new remote:

$ git remote add <YOUR_FORK> [email protected]:<YOUR_GITHUB_USERNAME>/opentelemetry-rust

Check out a new branch, make modifications, run linters and tests, and push the branch to your fork:

$ git checkout -b <YOUR_BRANCH_NAME>
# edit files
$ git add -p
$ git commit
$ git push <YOUR_FORK> <YOUR_BRANCH_NAME>

Open a pull request against the main opentelemetry-rust repo.

How to Receive Comments

  • If the PR is not ready for review, please put [WIP] in the title, tag it as work-in-progress, or mark it as draft.
  • Make sure CLA is signed and CI is clear.

How to Get PRs Merged

A PR is considered to be ready to merge when:

  • It has received approval from Collaborators/Maintainers.
  • Major feedback is resolved.

Any Collaborator/Maintainer can merge the PR once it is ready to merge.

Design Choices

As with other OpenTelemetry clients, opentelemetry-rust follows the opentelemetry-specification.

It's especially valuable to read through the library guidelines.

Focus on Capabilities, Not Structure Compliance

OpenTelemetry is an evolving specification, one where the desires and use cases are clear, but the method to satisfy those uses cases are not.

As such, Contributions should provide functionality and behavior that conforms to the specification, but the interface and structure is flexible.

It is preferable to have contributions follow the idioms of the language rather than conform to specific API names or argument patterns in the spec.

For a deeper discussion, see: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#165

Error Handling

Currently, the Opentelemetry Rust SDK has two ways to handle errors. In the situation where errors are not allowed to return. One should call global error handler to process the errors. Otherwise, one should return the errors.

The Opentelemetry Rust SDK comes with an error type openetelemetry::Error. For different function, one error has been defined. All error returned by trace module MUST be wrapped in opentelemetry::trace::TraceError. All errors returned by metrics module MUST be wrapped in opentelemetry::metrics::MetricsError.

For users that want to implement their own exporters. It's RECOMMENDED to wrap all errors from the exporter into a crate-level error type, and implement ExporterError trait.

Style Guide

  • Run cargo clippy --all - this will catch common mistakes and improve your Rust code
  • Run cargo fmt - this will find and fix code formatting issues.

Testing and Benchmarking

  • Run cargo test --all - this will execute code and doc tests for all projects in this workspace.
  • Run cargo bench - this will run benchmarks to show performance regressions

Approvers and Maintainers

For GitHub groups see the code owners file.

Maintainers

Approvers

Emeritus

Become an Approver or a Maintainer

See the community membership document in OpenTelemetry community repo.

FAQ

Where should I put third party propagators/exporters, contrib or standalone crates?

As of now, the specification classify the propagators into three categories: Fully opened standards, platform-specific standards, proprietary headers. The conclusion is only the fully opened standards should live in SDK packages/repos. So here, only fully opened standards should live as independent crate. For more detail and discussion, see this pr.