-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P1936 Dependent Static Assertion #675
Comments
Do we want a targeted language solution to the
Explore making the token sequence
Explore a new keyword, such as
Pursue the approach as written.
|
Based on my reading of the EWG-I feedback, there was no clear consensus on where to go, there IS some slight consensus by my reading of the 'static_fail', but it seems pretty weak to me. Either way, I think we probably need to see more info on this one. |
A previous paper #572 explores a library solution to the same problem |
This was resolved by #1251 |
P1936R0 Dependent Static Assertion (Ruslan Arutyunyan)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: