Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

custom network fee input (experimental) is in uatoms, should be in ATOMs #2455

Closed
jbibla opened this issue Apr 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

custom network fee input (experimental) is in uatoms, should be in ATOMs #2455

jbibla opened this issue Apr 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
bug 🐛 issues related to unhandled errors in the code that need to be fixed

Comments

@jbibla
Copy link
Collaborator

jbibla commented Apr 12, 2019

Describe the bug

It appears that fees are displayed in uatoms.

To Reproduce

Expected behavior

Screenshots

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS:
  • Browser:
  • Version:

Smartphone (please complete the following information):

  • Device:
  • OS:
  • Browser
  • Version

Additional context
@jbibla jbibla added the bug 🐛 issues related to unhandled errors in the code that need to be fixed label Apr 12, 2019
@fedekunze
Copy link
Contributor

It’s only the tag I think

@jbibla
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jbibla commented Apr 22, 2019

what do you mean?

@jbibla jbibla changed the title fees are displayed in uatoms and are not always accurate custom network fee input (experimental) is in uatoms, should be in ATOMs Apr 24, 2019
@faboweb faboweb mentioned this issue Apr 28, 2019
Merged
@faboweb
Copy link
Collaborator

faboweb commented May 2, 2019

Fixed

@faboweb faboweb closed this as completed May 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug 🐛 issues related to unhandled errors in the code that need to be fixed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@faboweb @jbibla @fedekunze