Implement ClientState::status()

[plafer]

Closes: #536

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 80.88% and project coverage change: +3.59% 🎉

Comparison is base (79cb166) 67.90% compared to head (4a69b49) 71.49%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #774      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.90%   71.49%   +3.59%     
==========================================
  Files         124      124              
  Lines       14806    14960     +154     
==========================================
+ Hits        10054    10696     +642     
+ Misses       4752     4264     -488     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
...ive/src/client_state/traits/client_state_common.rs	100.00% <ø> (+100.00%)	⬆️
crates/ibc/src/core/ics02_client/error.rs	24.32% <0.00%> (-3.81%)	⬇️
...s/ibc/src/hosts/tendermint/validate_self_client.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
crates/ibc/src/mock/context.rs	74.55% <33.33%> (-0.23%)	⬇️
crates/ibc/src/core/ics02_client/client_state.rs	50.00% <53.84%> (+50.00%)	⬆️
...bc/src/core/ics02_client/handler/upgrade_client.rs	94.44% <80.00%> (+3.69%)	⬆️
...rc/core/ics03_connection/handler/conn_open_init.rs	97.27% <80.00%> (-0.85%)	⬇️
...src/core/ics03_connection/handler/conn_open_ack.rs	96.28% <83.33%> (-0.35%)	⬇️
...core/ics03_connection/handler/conn_open_confirm.rs	98.27% <83.33%> (-0.55%)	⬇️
...src/core/ics03_connection/handler/conn_open_try.rs	93.68% <83.33%> (-0.35%)	⬇️
... and 18 more

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Farhad-Shabani]

Left a few suggestions. Otherwise LGTM. Thanks 🙏

[plafer]

Note: I had to reincorporate the path because otherwise whenever we make changes to ibc-derive, ibc doesn't see the changes, and it fails to compile

[Farhad-Shabani]

Therefore, good to add a [ibc-drive] tag for unclog. Like how this handled e.g. in tendermint-rs

[Farhad-Shabani]

Was thinking of adding this to the contributing.md. I see we already have it here

[Farhad-Shabani]

a unclog update and we are good. Thanks 🌷

[plafer]

Updated changelog; is this what you had in mind? Basically now we have only 1 entry that points to ibc-derive being changed, even though both ibc and ibc-derive were changed. Since this will always be the case (i.e. ibc-derive only changes when ibc changes), I figured it was self-explanatory?

[Farhad-Shabani]

Updated changelog; is this what you had in mind? Basically now we have only 1 entry that points to ibc-derive being changed, even though both ibc and ibc-derive were changed. Since this will always be the case (i.e. ibc-derive only changes when ibc changes), I figured it was self-explanatory?

Yup, this works.