Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade function for Tendermint light client #6378

Closed
cwgoes opened this issue Jun 9, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #7367
Closed

Upgrade function for Tendermint light client #6378

cwgoes opened this issue Jun 9, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #7367
Assignees

Comments

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Jun 9, 2020

Upgrades as specified in cosmos/ibc#447.

@cwgoes cwgoes added this to the IBC 1.0 milestone Jun 9, 2020
@cwgoes cwgoes self-assigned this Jun 9, 2020
@cwgoes cwgoes added the x/ibc label Jun 9, 2020
@fedekunze fedekunze added the T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation. label Jun 9, 2020
@cwgoes cwgoes added feature and removed T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation. labels Jun 15, 2020
@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Jun 15, 2020

We should allow Tendermint clients to accept proof of a particular key in state mapped to a new chain ID & height as sufficient reason to change their chain ID & height.

This can then be used to allow non-contentious upgrades which change chain ID and/or height.

@AdityaSripal
Copy link
Member

The mechanism used to deal with chain-id changes should also allow for changes to UnbondingPeriod, and ConsensusParams as described here: #6516

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Jul 7, 2020

Upgrade categories documented in detail here - cosmos/ibc#445.

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Jul 20, 2020

Further specification in cosmos/ibc#447.

@cwgoes cwgoes assigned AdityaSripal and unassigned cwgoes Jul 20, 2020
@cwgoes cwgoes changed the title Deal with changes to chain ID, height Upgrade function for Tendermint light client Jul 21, 2020
@fedekunze fedekunze added the S:blocked Status: Blocked label Aug 12, 2020
@fedekunze fedekunze removed the S:blocked Status: Blocked label Sep 4, 2020
@AdityaSripal AdityaSripal mentioned this issue Sep 22, 2020
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants