Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

blockdev: add support for saving mbr partitions #1047

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

prestist
Copy link
Contributor

@prestist prestist commented Nov 16, 2022

Fixes #957. If a MBR partition is marked to be saved, it will be translated using best effort to GPT. To elaborate on "best effort"; there is metadata which is present in GPT but not MBR, so it might not translate 1:1.

@prestist prestist force-pushed the convert-mbr-to-gpt branch 2 times, most recently from ed44938 to 7958259 Compare November 16, 2022 18:37
docs/release-notes.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/blockdev.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
src/blockdev.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@prestist prestist force-pushed the convert-mbr-to-gpt branch 2 times, most recently from 44c102f to ee7e164 Compare November 18, 2022 16:42
Copy link
Member

@cgwalters cgwalters left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a superficial review; I'm not very familiar with this code or the problem it's solving.

src/blockdev.rs Outdated

gpt_partition.partition_type_guid = *translate_mbr_types_to_gpt(mbr_partition.sys).as_bytes();
gpt_partition.unique_partition_guid = *Uuid::new_v4().as_bytes();
gpt_partition.starting_lba = u64::from(mbr_partition.starting_lba);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's a bit more common to just use as u64 here. That said there's also the try_from() variant which might make sense to actually validate things.

src/blockdev.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
src/blockdev.rs Outdated
for (i, p) in mbr.iter() {
if Self::matches_filters_mbr(i.try_into().unwrap(), p, filters) {
// if the partition is using any of the last 33 sectors, we need to bail.
if p.starting_lba + p.sectors < mbr.disk_size - 33 {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

May be worth hosting 33 into a const FINAL_SECTORS: u32 = 33 above?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We'd also need a comment explaining how we arrived at 33 sectors. But note also that MBR is supported on 4Kn-sector disks (they just aren't bootable). The backup GPT requires fewer sectors in that case.

GPTs are allowed to reserve more than the minimum number of sectors at either end of the disk. We don't really check for that in the non-MBR case either, and don't have a way to, since we haven't seen the install image's partition table. But I believe in that case we'd fail to restore partitions after installing and would then roll back to a fresh GPT with only the saved partitions, thus not losing data.

Long story short, I think we should probably skip this check. The dry run below should catch overlarge partitions if there are any. (But we should still have a test case for this.)

src/blockdev.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@bgilbert bgilbert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the commit message, the prefix should be blockdev:, not blockdev.rs:. Also I think "best effort" probably undersells the result. We do translate the important parts (offset/length/partition number); the boot flag isn't relevant and the type code is basically ignored on Linux. Let's explain which parts of the translation are fuzzy, but not introduce doubt about the validity of the result.

Cargo.toml Outdated
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ flate2 = "^1.0"
glob = "^0.3"
# disable default-enabled cli in gptman 0.x
gptman = { version = ">= 0.7, < 2", default-features = false }
mbrman = ">= 0.5, < 0.6"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alphabetical order, please.

docs/release-notes.md Show resolved Hide resolved
src/blockdev.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/blockdev.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/blockdev.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/blockdev.rs Outdated
// if the partition is using any of the last 33 sectors, we need to bail.
if p.starting_lba + p.sectors < mbr.disk_size - 33 {
partitions.push((
i.try_into().context("convert usize into u32")?,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're going to wrap with an error, let's make it clear what the problem was.

src/blockdev.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/blockdev.rs Outdated
SavedPartitions::new(&mut disk, 512, &vec![label("*i*")]).unwrap();
let mut mbr = mbrman::MBR::new_from(&mut disk, 512 as u32, [0xff; 4])
.expect("could not create partition table");

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One logical test case spans multiple code blocks, which is confusing.

src/blockdev.rs Outdated
);
// label and index
let saved = SavedPartitions::new(&mut disk, 512, &vec![Index(index(1), index(1))]).unwrap();
assert!(saved.is_saved());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're only checking that we think we succeeded, but we're not actually verifying the results against expected values. Let's fix that. In particular, we should check the resulting type GUIDs.

We should be testing a non-trivial MBR layout, where we aren't asking to save all of the partitions. That layout should include logical partitions. And we should also test saving a wildcard label * (which we might decide should match either everything or nothing).

We should also test with a 4Kn disk.

src/blockdev.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@prestist prestist force-pushed the convert-mbr-to-gpt branch from 2ee47d6 to 174f953 Compare August 4, 2023 20:03
Fixes coreos#957. If a non extended MBR partition is marked to be saved,
it will be translated to a gpt partition.
@prestist prestist force-pushed the convert-mbr-to-gpt branch from 174f953 to 8889817 Compare August 4, 2023 20:03
@prestist prestist changed the title blockdev.rs: add support for saving mbr partitions blockdev: add support for saving mbr partitions Aug 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Partition saving should handle converting MBR partitions to GPT
4 participants