-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error: invalid entry point PID of container rhel-toolbox-8.2 #691
Comments
What's the output from:
|
|
These are the important lines:
Looks like there's a |
|
I had trouble running rhel-toolbox-8.3 on my SB33, which I reported in |
|
@felipehw what do you have something on your system /mnt or /var/mnt? |
|
I see:
|
@juhp I thought the |
I don't know, but maybe one (or more) of your mount options could be causing a problem 🤷♂️
(my comment was in reply to Rishi's question to you). |
Interesting. @felipehw how did you mount those locations? Did you manually set those up? Or did you just plug the disk in, and let GNOME handle it? I am guessing that there was some manual configuration involved because usually GNOME mounts removable devices under I also see that you have a Toolbox bind mounts locations like To be honest, I am not sure I tested your particular use-case. I remember testing new mount points showing up on the host after the container was started. |
I'm a (±newbie) Linux user since the 2000s. So I have setups that I reproduce since many years ago. I have 2 static mount points. I thought this is a "standard" setup ... |
Actually I realised I am hitting the same problem I think. |
I can't enter to any container using any image different from fedora-toolbox-34. I consider it's this same bug because the verbose output contains this suspicious lines.
The same lines present on the initial message on this issue (but with 33 instead of 34). In my case I tried with different images of different distros including fedora 33 based images. But only containers using fedora 34 images seems to work. I'd say that toolbox is expecting to find a fedora 34 (or 33) based container regardless of the image actually being in use and that's the cause of this bug. |
I have (had) very similar issue that manifested itself in the exact same manner. The issue happened only on some older ubuntu containers (18.04) but would work fine on ubuntu 20.04 and fedora containers. The culprit was an NFS mount I had in a subdirectory of What I would like to discuss it the fact that running with high verbosity ( |
Yes I am seeing mount fstype errors with various images including centos recently. $ podman start -ai centos-8
:
level=debug msg="Creating directory /var/mnt"
level=debug msg="Binding /var/mnt to /run/host/var/mnt"
mount: /var/mnt: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /run/host/var/mnt, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
Error: failed to bind /var/mnt to /run/host/var/mnt |
I have the same problem if I'd run rhel-packager container on Silverblue system. Silverblue does have
|
Seems like an old issue here, but I'm still running into it with these simple commands on Fedora 40: ❯ podman pull atlassian/default-image:4
...
Copying config cd33188942 done |
...
❯ podman tag cd33188942 my-image
❯ toolbox create -i my-image
❯ toolbox enter
Error: invalid entry point PID of container my-image
❯ toolbox --version
toolbox version 0.0.99.5 |
This happens every single time I reboot my system, and I have to rebuild all of my containers. Luckily I only have two and I have scripts to build them. |
Describe the bug
I tried to create a
rhel
container using the new flag--distro
in a Silverblue environment but without success.Steps how to reproduce the behaviour
Output of
toolbox --version
(v0.0.90+)Toolbox package info (
rpm -q toolbox
)Output of
podman version
Podman package info (
rpm -q podman
)Info about your OS
Fedora Silverblue
33.20210208.0 (2021-02-08T00:58:46Z)
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: