We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug By the docker compose spec, each included files should be treated as individual project. Meaning that
suggesting a structure as
./include/ ├── docker-compose.yaml ├── extend │ └── docker-compose.extend.yaml └── extend2 └── docker-compose.extend2.yaml
where as each extended docker-compose try to map ./config, Calling docker compose at include
./config
Expected behavior
service in extend map extend/config; extend2 map extend2/config
extend
extend/config
extend2
extend2/config
Actual behavior
all service mapping include/config
include/config
Output
$ podman-compose version podman-compose version 1.0.7 podman version 4.3.1 podman --version podman version 4.3.1
Additional context
It is not a run time problem, but an designing inconsistance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related document Compose spec docker-compose/include
Sorry, something went wrong.
include
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
By the docker compose spec, each included files should be treated as individual project. Meaning that
To Reproduce
suggesting a structure as
where as each extended docker-compose try to map
./config
, Calling docker compose at includeExpected behavior
service in
extend
mapextend/config
;extend2
mapextend2/config
Actual behavior
all service mapping
include/config
Output
Additional context
It is not a run time problem, but an designing inconsistance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: