We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Due to #419 from @ChengyuZhu6 , we have a plan to publish some crates of guest-components to crates.io. But now we have the following crates
members = [ "api-server-rest", "attestation-agent/app", "attestation-agent/lib", "attestation-agent/kbc", "attestation-agent/kbs_protocol", "attestation-agent/attester", "attestation-agent/deps/resource_uri", "attestation-agent/deps/crypto", "attestation-agent/deps/sev", "attestation-agent/coco_keyprovider", "attestation-agent/test-binaries", "confidential-data-hub/hub", "confidential-data-hub/kms", "confidential-data-hub/image", "confidential-data-hub/secret", "confidential-data-hub/storage", "image-rs", "ocicrypt-rs", ]
Some of them might have too universal name like image, and thus cause naming clash when cargo audit.
image
cargo audit
Due to suggestion from @mkulke , we are hoping to making some crates into modules.
cc @fitzthum @mythi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hub
./confidential-data-hub
edit, there's also docs + some golang code in ./hub, so I think we can leave it at this.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Xynnn007
No branches or pull requests
Due to #419 from @ChengyuZhu6 , we have a plan to publish some crates of guest-components to crates.io. But now we have the following crates
Some of them might have too universal name like
image
, and thus cause naming clash whencargo audit
.Due to suggestion from @mkulke , we are hoping to making some crates into modules.
cc @fitzthum @mythi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: