Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dev update 20231215 #16

Merged
merged 58 commits into from
Dec 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@Tobias-Fischer Tobias-Fischer changed the title Delete recipe/fix-pybind11.patch Dev update 20231215 Dec 14, 2023
@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you but ran into some issues. Please check the output logs of the latest rerendering GitHub actions workflow run for errors. You can also ping conda-forge/core for further assistance or try re-rendering locally.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/pycolmap-feedstock/actions/runs/7215182845.

@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you but ran into some issues. Please check the output logs of the latest rerendering GitHub actions workflow run for errors. You can also ping conda-forge/core for further assistance or try re-rendering locally.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/pycolmap-feedstock/actions/runs/7215321687.

@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Needs conda-forge/colmap-feedstock#30

Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you but ran into some issues. Please check the output logs of the latest rerendering GitHub actions workflow run for errors. You can also ping conda-forge/core for further assistance or try re-rendering locally.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/pycolmap-feedstock/actions/runs/7280748063.

@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@conda-forge-admin please rerender

Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you but ran into some issues. Please check the output logs of the latest rerendering GitHub actions workflow run for errors. You can also ping conda-forge/core for further assistance or try re-rendering locally.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/pycolmap-feedstock/actions/runs/7281139650.

@carterbox
Copy link
Member

My general tips are to use the latest CMake CUDA features such as enable_language(CUDA) and/or find_package(CUDAToolkit) (not find_package(CUDA)).

Specifically for this recipe, it doesn't seem like having the CUDA compiler is necessary at all, since there doesn't seem to be any device code in pycolmap, so I'm not sure why your CMakeLists are searching for the CUDA Toolkit. Probably, you can just build one cuda/noncuda variant for each python version because the ABI for all of the CUDA variants of colmap is the same. An example of this is astra-toolbox, where the CUDA variant of this python package links to any of the CUDA builds of libastra.

@Tobias-Fischer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @carterbox! Looks like all is green now. I think upstream will soon combine colmap and pycolmap in a single repo anyhow, so I won’t be changing / patching here further.

@Tobias-Fischer Tobias-Fischer merged commit ebb29cc into conda-forge:dev Dec 22, 2023
@Tobias-Fischer Tobias-Fischer deleted the dev-update branch December 22, 2023 01:43
Comment on lines +56 to +57
- scikit-build
- scikit-build-core
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason to add both scikit-build & scikit-build-core?

Thought it was one or the other. IIUC scikit-build-core is replacing scikit-build

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants