We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
no_link: lib/libcrypto
This feedstock has had a no_link: directive since its inception:
no_link:
openssl-feedstock/recipe/meta.yaml
Lines 14 to 15 in 7c460ed
I'm pretty sure I messed this up in the 3.0 transition, because the new libcrypto library just has a SOVER of 3, and not 3.0.
libcrypto
Given that this most likely hasn't been used/functional for the last 2.5 years, I'm wondering if the original reason for adding it is still relevant?
@conda-forge/openssl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It doesn't look like it was discussed in staged-recipes either
staged-recipes
xref: conda-forge/staged-recipes#553
Anaconda appears to still have it in their recipe
If I had to guess, OpenSSL relies on a certain layout. Adding no_link ensures that layout is met
no_link
Maybe someone else remembers more clearly
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
This feedstock has had a
no_link:
directive since its inception:openssl-feedstock/recipe/meta.yaml
Lines 14 to 15 in 7c460ed
I'm pretty sure I messed this up in the 3.0 transition, because the new
libcrypto
library just has a SOVER of 3, and not 3.0.Given that this most likely hasn't been used/functional for the last 2.5 years, I'm wondering if the original reason for adding it is still relevant?
@conda-forge/openssl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: