Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Analysis of data with a large number of duplicates #62

Closed
maxnest opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Analysis of data with a large number of duplicates #62

maxnest opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@maxnest
Copy link

maxnest commented Jan 29, 2024

Dear colleagues,
Thank you for developing such a useful tool. Unfortunately, in my case the pipeline stops with an error stating that the fasta files with proteins contain duplicated sequences. I see two options as possible solutions: 1) clustering similar sequences using CDHIT and including only 1 representative sequence from each cluster in the analysis, or 2) parsing the results of orthologues searches (OrthoFinder output tables) and then selecting 1 protein per species from each orthogroups. However, in any case, such a reduction in information redundancy will affect the study of data, because we exclude gene duplications from consideration. Given presence of duplications, could you please tell what strategy for analyzing data with many identical proteins would you recommend? Should I specify “best” as a value for a “duplicate_proteins” parameter in the config file?
I would appreciate any advice.
Best regards,
Maksim

@conchoecia
Copy link
Owner

Our pipeline does not currently have any special considerations to account for the history of WGD events. For a quick solution that will allow you move forward to check for homology, please see this comment: #49 (comment)

@conchoecia
Copy link
Owner

Closing - please reopen if you have questions or suggestions about duplicate handling

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants