Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Coverage status #309

Closed
glebihan opened this issue Sep 15, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

[FEATURE] Coverage status #309

glebihan opened this issue Sep 15, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@glebihan
Copy link

glebihan commented Sep 15, 2017

Currently, in the coverage report, there are 3 statuses :

  • under 25% = red
  • 25% to 50 % = orange
  • over 50% = green

It seems to me that considering anything above 50% as good is excessive.

It appears that behavior was changed by these 2 commits, at least the first one being a mistake :

cd865cb#diff-dd3f3a3527d580cbaba14648e83c7206L570
a01ee06#diff-dd3f3a3527d580cbaba14648e83c7206L666

Would it be possible to restore the 'very-good' status at > 75% that used to exist ?

Thanks.

@vogloblinsky vogloblinsky added this to the 1.0.2 milestone Sep 15, 2017
@vogloblinsky vogloblinsky changed the title Coverage status [FEATURE] Coverage status Sep 15, 2017
@glebihan
Copy link
Author

Thanks!

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 1, 2019

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem. Why locking ? Having issues with the most up-to-date context.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants