You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Pull request follows. I tried to get rid of every references to complex typed static variables. The object typed (non pointer) static data members I replaced by static getters that declare the variable as pointer, assignes NULL to it, and then does a NULL check and assigns a 'new' instance at the first time.
There were many static locals declared with type QByteArray but used only as const char * later. I changed the types to 'const char *' wherever I could.
In other cases the static locals were used only as performance tweak. There, I simply removed the 'static' keyword. All of them were trivial functions, the 'static' keyword was not necessary and I doubt that it made noticeable difference in execution time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The pythonqt.dll crashes when you try to load it dynamically on Windows. The crash happens at this point:
PythonQt/src/PythonQtConversion.h
Line 166 in 503597b
The static function refers to a static variable that has complex type (QHash). The static variable is not initialised.
The issue is described here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5114683/loading-dll-not-initializing-static-c-classes
Basically, complex typed static variables should be avoided in dll-s.
Pull request follows. I tried to get rid of every references to complex typed static variables. The object typed (non pointer) static data members I replaced by static getters that declare the variable as pointer, assignes NULL to it, and then does a NULL check and assigns a 'new' instance at the first time.
There were many static locals declared with type QByteArray but used only as const char * later. I changed the types to 'const char *' wherever I could.
In other cases the static locals were used only as performance tweak. There, I simply removed the 'static' keyword. All of them were trivial functions, the 'static' keyword was not necessary and I doubt that it made noticeable difference in execution time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: