process's or process'

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

codespell/codespell_lib/data/dictionary_code.txt

Line 53 in 94dfe18

process'->process's

Later versions of the U.S. Government Publishing Office Style Manual suggest the s is dropped.

2008

Apostrophes and possessives

8.3. The possessive case of a singular or plural noun not ending in s is formed by adding an apostrophe and s. The possessive case of a singular or plural noun ending in s or with an s sound is formed by adding an apostrophe only.
[...]
boss’, bosses’
[...]

2000

Apostrophes and possessives

8.3. All singular nouns form their possessive case by the addition of an apostrophe and an s. Plural nouns ending in s form their plurals by adding only an apostrophe.
[...]
boss’s, bosses’
[...]

Perhaps it's time we drop such fixes, especially those that are wrong any way (files'->file's could be plural):

$ grep -R "s'->" codespell_lib/data/
codespell_lib/data/dictionary.txt:aircrafts'->aircraft's
codespell_lib/data/dictionary.txt:gaus'->Gauss'
codespell_lib/data/dictionary.txt:guas'->Gauss'
codespell_lib/data/dictionary.txt:guass'->Gauss'
codespell_lib/data/dictionary.txt:packges'->packages'
codespell_lib/data/dictionary.txt:thats'->that's
codespell_lib/data/dictionary_code.txt:files'->file's
codespell_lib/data/dictionary_code.txt:process'->process's
codespell_lib/data/dictionary_code.txt:subprocess'->subprocess's

[isaak654]

I agree, plus this correction produces unnecessary warnings:
SBIEMSG.js:13: process' ==> process's
Line 13 of SBIEMSG.js:
{ id: 'process', name: tr('Name affected process'), type: 'edit', hint: 'Program.exe when applicable' },

Meanwhile, I'm using --ignore-words-list="process'" as workaround.