Skip to content

No labels!

There aren’t any labels for this repository quite yet.

2 (Med Risk)
2 (Med Risk)
Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value
3 (High Risk)
3 (High Risk)
Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly
bug
bug
Something isn't working
disagree with severity
disagree with severity
Sponsor confirms validity, but disagrees with warden’s risk assessment (sponsor explain in comments)
discussion closed
discussion closed
Judge has reviewed and integrated all feedback
documentation
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
downgraded by judge
downgraded by judge
Judge downgraded the risk level of this issue
duplicate
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
edited-by-warden
edited-by-warden
enhancement
enhancement
New feature or request
flag for judge
flag for judge
Judge should review this issue
G (Gas Optimization)
G (Gas Optimization)
help wanted
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
high quality report
high quality report
This report is of especially high quality
in discussion
in discussion
Discussion about this issue is ongoing, and not yet resolved.
invalid
invalid
This doesn't seem right
low quality report
low quality report
This report is of especially low quality
out of scope
out of scope
This finding falls outside the contest scope as delineated in the contest README
partial-25
partial-25
Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (25%)
partial-50
partial-50
Incomplete articulation of vulnerability; eligible for partial credit only (50%)
primary issue
primary issue
Highest quality submission among a set of duplicates
QA (Quality Assurance)
QA (Quality Assurance)
Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
question
question
Further information is requested
resolved
resolved
Finding has been patched by sponsor (sponsor pls link to PR containing fix)
satisfactory
satisfactory
satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards
selected for report
selected for report
This submission will be included/highlighted in the audit report
sponsor acknowledged
sponsor acknowledged
Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons
sponsor confirmed
sponsor confirmed
Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
sponsor disputed
sponsor disputed
Sponsor cannot duplicate the issue, or otherwise disagrees this is an issue
unsatisfactory
unsatisfactory
does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards