Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AbstractRewardMine.getRewardOwnershipFraction shouldn't be used internally #114

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Nov 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

hyh

Vulnerability details

Impact

Gas is overspent on function calls.

Proof of Concept

earned function calls public getRewardOwnershipFraction function:
https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-11-malt/blob/main/src/contracts/AbstractRewardMine.sol#L144

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Now:

function totalDeclaredReward() virtual public view returns (uint256) {
	return rewardToken.balanceOf(address(this));
}
function getRewardOwnershipFraction(address account) public view returns(uint256 numerator, uint256 denominator) {
	numerator = balanceOfRewards(account);
	denominator = totalDeclaredReward();
}
...
function earned(address account) public view returns (uint256 earnedReward) {
	(uint256 rewardNumerator, uint256 rewardDenominator) = getRewardOwnershipFraction(account);

To be:

function earned(address account) public view returns (uint256 earnedReward) {
	uint256 rewardNumerator = balanceOfRewards(account);
	uint256 rewardDenominator = rewardToken.balanceOf(address(this));
@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Nov 29, 2021
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2021
@0xScotch 0xScotch added the sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") label Dec 9, 2021
@GalloDaSballo
Copy link
Collaborator

The finding is valid, using the same public functions instead of a new one would save the cost of an extra JUMP
I believe you could also save gas by using internal functions as the compiler will inline them.

That said, the finding saves gas, personally I wouldn't apply the improvement as I believe it would impair readability

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants