-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As of today COPR no longer works as it is missing an EPEL8 build. @martinpitt #17413
Comments
I disabled it a while ago, as we don't test epel-8 at all. I suppose the builds stayed around for a few weeks until COPR cleaned them up? For technical reasons it's actually quite involved to change the build targets (packit/packit-service#1499), but I keep this open -- the next time we touch this, we can put it back on (but beware, it's entirely unsupported/untested). |
from what is visible to me i can see wouldn't it be reasonable then to follow a non-stream el8 by having an epel8 build and testing it? @martinpitt : bump. maybe my question has been missed due to vacation |
I second the request to re-implement epel-8 as build target for COPR. |
This finally got unblocked by a packit improvement -- I just sent a bunch of PRs like #17783 to drop the hardcoded target list from our packit.yml. After all of these land, we gain back the flexibility of adding more COPR targets such as EPEL. |
Sorry for letting this slip -- I finally enabled epel 8/9 for x86_64 and aarch64 on our COPR. |
As of today COPR no longer works as it is missing an EPEL8 build. @martinpitt
It was present until at least 22/04/05 @ https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@cockpit/cockpit-preview/epel-8-x86_64/
Are there any plans on providing EPEL8 builds again ?
Using the centos8stream builds is not an options as they depend on non-existent versions of policy-targeted
Originally posted by @fmsy in #17061 (reply in thread)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: