-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Participants in the scrum council weekly #23
Comments
if only the status of the projects is going to be discussed, I prefer not to be at this meeting. |
I think that if the PM gives the status of the project, the presence of the QA is not necessary. Unless the PM cannot attend the meeting and it is the QA who must comment on it. The invitation would only be passed on that day with prior notification. (This is not a recurring case). |
I think QA staff shouldn't be involved in the Project Scrum Council meetings. The PMs are the ones that can give feedback about the project status. On the daily meetings, the PM can take a few minutes to explain the results of the meeting about the project status. |
the presence of the Qa is necessary if you are doing a mixed Qa /Pm work or as in my case Project and Quality Specialist. If the presence of the Qa would be necessary if for some reason the PM is going to be absent from the Scrum Council, in this case, he must inform the Qa of the status of the project, and notify that it will be the Qa of the project who will be present to give the status of the project. |
It looks like only the accounts managers and PMs talk. Is necessary the attendance of the QAs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: