Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Can we implement "Overloaded X" for X in {Integer, String, ...}? #51

Closed
stylewarning opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Can we implement "Overloaded X" for X in {Integer, String, ...}? #51

stylewarning opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request type system The Coalton type system
Milestone
0.1 Release

Comments

@stylewarning
Copy link
Member

What are the current issues & what would we need to do to implement "overloaded literals"?
@bitmappergit bitmappergit mentioned this issue Sep 3, 2021
Closed
@stylewarning stylewarning changed the title Can we implemented "Overloaded X" for X in {Integer, String, ...}? Can we implement "Overloaded X" for X in {Integer, String, ...}? Sep 6, 2021
@eliaslfox eliaslfox pinned this issue Sep 7, 2021
@eliaslfox eliaslfox added enhancement New feature or request type system The Coalton type system labels Sep 10, 2021
@eliaslfox eliaslfox added this to the 0.1 Release milestone Sep 17, 2021
@eliaslfox eliaslfox mentioned this issue Dec 11, 2021
Closed
@eliaslfox
Copy link
Collaborator

Overloaded integer literals have been added. Other overloaded literals could be easily added if desired.

@eliaslfox eliaslfox unpinned this issue Mar 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request type system The Coalton type system
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.1 Release
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@stylewarning @eliaslfox