Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: support k3s/k8s #414

Open
1 task done
mouuii opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
1 task done

Feature: support k3s/k8s #414

mouuii opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mouuii
Copy link

mouuii commented Oct 16, 2024

Have you searched for this feature request?

  • I searched but did not find similar requests

Problem Statement

we now use kind , can we use k3s or k8s??
idpbuild create --kubeconfigPath xxx

Possible Solution

k8s

Alternatives Considered

No response

@mouuii mouuii added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 16, 2024
@nabuskey
Copy link
Collaborator

It's very likely possible. We'll need to come up with a provisioner interface and handle any implementation specific things but we should be able to support core features relatively easily

@mouuii
Copy link
Author

mouuii commented Oct 17, 2024

@nabuskey provisioner interface is good , like k8s cloudprovider , btw , I want to deploy on k3d , google cloud and other different type of k8s , I think the work is not that much , the interface can be simple .

Is there any roadmap ? I want to know which feature plan is accepted .

@nabuskey
Copy link
Collaborator

Here's the project link: https://github.com/orgs/cnoe-io/projects/8
Milestones: https://github.com/cnoe-io/idpbuilder/milestones

Deployment to remote clusters was proposed earlier this year but was rejected due to some concerns around security, best practices around deployment processes, and the maturity of this project. Perhaps we can bring it up again if you have concrete use cases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants