From 7174086086df37156c166b084c5e1da6cef2e3f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Luo <gluokai@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 08:34:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Use jitlink::Section::blocks::empty instead

---
 .../llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/ELF_ppc64.cpp           | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/interpreter/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/ELF_ppc64.cpp b/interpreter/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/ELF_ppc64.cpp
index ad3d56e70206e..7e8a8a0be0cb1 100644
--- a/interpreter/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/ELF_ppc64.cpp
+++ b/interpreter/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/ELF_ppc64.cpp
@@ -422,8 +422,9 @@ class ELFJITLinker_ppc64 : public JITLinker<ELFJITLinker_ppc64<Endianness>> {
 
     if (Section *TOCSection = G.findSectionByName(
             ppc64::TOCTableManager<Endianness>::getSectionName())) {
-      assert(!TOCSection->empty() && "TOC section should have reserved an "
-                                     "entry for containing the TOC base");
+      assert(!TOCSection->blocks().empty() &&
+             "TOC section should have reserved an "
+             "entry for containing the TOC base");
 
       SectionRange SR(*TOCSection);
       orc::ExecutorAddr TOCBaseAddr(SR.getFirstBlock()->getAddress() +