-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve data-integrity check in ECAL GPU unpacker #42090
Comments
A new Issue was created by @missirol Marino Missiroli. @Dr15Jones, @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio, @makortel, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
assign hlt (Not strictly an HLT issue, but relevant to HLT.) |
New categories assigned: hlt @missirol,@Martin-Grunewald you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
assign reconstruction, heterogeneous |
New categories assigned: heterogeneous,reconstruction @mandrenguyen,@fwyzard,@clacaputo,@makortel you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
type ecal |
An improved version can be found in PR #42301. |
please close Closing this issue. @cms-sw/heterogeneous-l2 and @cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 already signed the corresponding PR, so I assume they agree. |
#41977 was integrated in
13_2_X
as a potential solution to #39568 (and it was also backported to13_0_X
and13_1_X
).Even after #41977, the treatment of integrity errors in the ECAL GPU unpacker is not yet identical to one in the ECAL CPU unpacker (see #41977 (comment) and replies), and this should be improved.
Attn: @cms-sw/ecal-dpg-l2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: