Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PF candidates with zero pT and large pseudorapidity #40626

Open
mandrenguyen opened this issue Jan 26, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

PF candidates with zero pT and large pseudorapidity #40626

mandrenguyen opened this issue Jan 26, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in #40032 there seem to be rare cases of PF candidates with anomalous kinematics.
While we now protect from known crashes in downstream modules, it would be good to understand the source of the problem to prevent future issues.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Issue was created by @mandrenguyen Matthew Nguyen.

@Dr15Jones, @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio, @makortel, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor Author

assign pf, reconstruction
@cms-sw/pf-l2

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: pf,reconstruction

@mandrenguyen,@clacaputo,@kdlong,@juska you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@swagata87
Copy link
Contributor

to understand the source of the problem one might still need the original raw file where it crashed, i.e. a recipe to reproduce the problem (this does not work anymore ) ; without at least one example event where the issue occurs it's rather hard to gain any insight on this

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Indeed. We have the run number. If we also had lumi/event info, we could track down the event. @laurenhay Any chance you still have access to that info from the tests you ran for #40088
?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants