chaining toReplaceWith

[vlimant]

I was wondering if there is a major issue with allowing

(Modifier_A | Modifier_B).toReplaceWith(something, something_else).toReplaceWith(something_dfiferent, something_else_different)

instead of

(Modifier_A | Modifier_B).toReplaceWith(something, something_else) (Modifier_A | Modifier_B).toReplaceWith(something_dfiferent, something_else_different)

and for other modifier functions

[cmsbuild]

A new Issue was created by @vlimant vlimant.

@Dr15Jones, @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio, @makortel, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[makortel]

assign core

[cmsbuild]

New categories assigned: core

@Dr15Jones,@smuzaffar,@makortel you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

[makortel]

Thanks for the suggestion, the chaining of toModify() and toReplaceWith() function calls is implemented in #39342

[vlimant]

awesome !

[makortel]

+core

[cmsbuild]

This issue is fully signed and ready to be closed.