Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Utilities/XrdAdaptor] Multi-source open requests should specify triedrc=resel #28716

Closed
osschar opened this issue Jan 7, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Comments

@osschar
Copy link
Contributor

osschar commented Jan 7, 2020

Since xrootd-4.10 xrootd server supports differentiated processing of file-open requests for server reselection. There are two main uses:

  1. Local storage accessed through xrootd where server reselection should not "escape" outside of the local cluster.
  2. XCache clusters, where opening of a file multiple times effectively creates several copies of that file in the cache, thus wasting the cache space.

Both of these use-cases are covered by introducing the opaque parameter triedrc=resel into the request URL when opening a new file for multi-source reading.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 7, 2020

A new Issue was created by @osschar Matev Tadel.

@Dr15Jones, @smuzaffar, @silviodonato, @kpedro88, @davidlange6, @fabiocos can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@osschar
Copy link
Contributor Author

osschar commented Jan 7, 2020

Justas (juztas) and @osschar will do the changes, @bbockelm agreed to help and review the changes.

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

makortel commented Jan 8, 2020

assign core

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 8, 2020

New categories assigned: core

@Dr15Jones,@smuzaffar,@makortel you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Done in #34700

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is fully signed and ready to be closed.

@qliphy qliphy closed this as completed Apr 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants