Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different charges end up in single chargegroups #11

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Feb 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Different charges end up in single chargegroups #11

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Feb 15, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

The kludge that makes "per bend or and sable a crescent and a goute 
counterchanged" work, in joining the crescent and the goute into a single 
chargegroup, is, well, a kludge.  And it does bad things with "argent an 
escutcheon gules between mullets vert" etc.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 24 Mar 2008 at 10:57

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Similarly, you can't say "ermine a roundel sable and a mullet gules in pale".  
You 
have to put the "in pale" after the *first* part, and say "ermine a roundel 
sable in 
pale and a mullet gules", which is weird. Part of the same hack.

Also related, "in chief" has to come after the charge, while blazons seem to 
have it 
before the charge more often.

Original comment by [email protected] on 24 Mar 2008 at 10:58

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by [email protected] on 24 Mar 2008 at 11:15

  • Changed title: Different charges end up in single chargegroups

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant