-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ignore fewer doc-tests #682
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
330a376
tests: run or compile some currently ignored doc-tests
tormol 0ba9f4b
docs: tag non-rust code blocks as such instead of ignoring them
tormol 8c0f555
docs(yaml): make sure the doc-tests don't fail before "missing file"
tormol 4c27f0a
tests: run OsString-using doc-tests on unix platforms
tormol af9e1a3
docs: fix the OsString-using doc-tests
tormol da88fd2
style: only ignore clippy warning if lints are enabled
tormol 996fc38
docs: fix tests that fail when the "suggestions" feature is disabled
tormol 9f6217a
docs(ErrorKind): improve some errors about subcommands
tormol 3ccde7a
docs: reword docs for ErrorKind and app::Settings
tormol 86828a5
chore(debug): fix a single typo in a debug message
tormol 835f75e
fix(features): Make lints not enable other nightly-requiring features
tormol df2c408
chore(travis): test more feature combinations and remove the "travis"…
tormol 4ee85b9
docs: Improve documentation around features
tormol File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should keep
nightly
in order to differentiate between "clap unstable features (can sometimes build on stable Rust)" and "Rust unstable features, requires nightly compiler"There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tormol
Forgot to at-mention your name 😉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I get the difference now, and also realize that removing a feature flag is a breaking.
Due to the feature name i assumed
clap_app!
required a nightly compiler.I got a notification for the first comment, but I haven't had time to respond.