-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 260
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Not all blocks parsed #73
Comments
Looking up that particular transaction works fine on my installation. I'll do a full test and see if there are any txids missing. Is anyone else hitting this problem? I'm not sure what would be causing this. The code to generate the tx hash index is pretty straightforward. I'm guessing a reinstallation would fix your problem, but that's not a very satisfying answer. |
Thanks for checking so quickly. So it is a local problem of sorts? That’s weird. Does it matter to BlockSci whether the |
A stab in the dark: I am re-building the BlockSci index using the |
Hmm, loading the whole bitcoin chain using Is there anything else I can try to debug? I tried to load elements related to the missing transaction, but they are all missing:
Indeed, when I run
it says only 364308 blocks are found, when we should be at 515707 blocks now, and my
Maybe my bitcoin data directory is somehow corrupt? Or what else would make ./blocksci_parser not look at all blocks? |
Ok, reparsing fixed it. Sorry for the noise! |
i had the same issue, for me it was when the txes were not all properly indexed on the machine, pretty annoying but hey the solution was to reindex the blockchain then to reparse the entire chain, |
I am reparsing again, but I am running into #100 it seems :( |
FYI by removing parser/blockList.dat I was able to get blocksci to reload the blocks. |
It seems that BlockSci does not reliably index all transactions. For example, this transaction is found using
but not using
I created the index using
and the parser finished successfully.
There are more transactions affected, but I could not yet detect a pattern. It is not the case that it simply ignores all transaction with nulldata output, as transactions like this are found just fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: