-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unable to convert wallet to new schema #35
Comments
I have the same issue. I upgraded and cannot access any accounts. Is there any user support for this product? |
Same Issue here trying to convert from schema 16. |
Hi everyone, I created a new vault file and then imported all my accounts. There are several issues with this:
Suggestions:
|
Does anyone here know how to obtain your private key from the BIP32 Extended Private Key? That will solve most of the issues because you can control your coins from another wallet or blockchain.info |
There are some known issues with migrating vault files. DO NOT SEND transactions with v0.10.1 through 0.10.5 as these versions have a critical database corruption issue. Unfortunately, recreating the vault file using v0.10.6 (or later) from accounts is the only workaround. |
You can download an older version from mSigna here https://ciphrex.com/releases/win64/ I had the same issue when upgrading to a new PC, i installed newer mSigna and it was a no go. I just installed the older version so I could access my wallet. I will just send all my coins to my hardware wallet, upgrade mSigna and then load back what I want to trade with. |
Hi,
I'm use msigna for long time ago, now i download the latest version and try to open my wallet, but i'm facing with a problme:
First msigna say:
"File was created using schema 17. Current schema version is 22.
Schema can be upgraded. Would you like to make a backup and migrate the file to the new schema now?"
So i choose OK for this.
Than I get this error:
"operation can only be performed in transaction"
Is there any way to convert my old wallet somehow?
Thanks!
Regards
Daniel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: