Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Download only choco package, no extraction #2139

Closed
tapika opened this issue Oct 17, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Download only choco package, no extraction #2139

tapika opened this issue Oct 17, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@tapika
Copy link

tapika commented Oct 17, 2020

At the moment -n option downloads and extracts nuget package.

I would propose to have -skipunzip to only download package without unpacking nuget package.

Then later on that can be installed by using -s <folder to where download happened>.

Also using -packagedir would override ApplicationParameters.PackagesLocation.

@TheCakeIsNaOH
Copy link
Member

This has some overlap with the download command in the paid editions.
https://chocolatey.org/docs/commands-download

I would be surprised this would be implemented, or if the chocolatey team would be willing to merge a PR.

Equivalent issue for the licensed edition:
chocolatey/chocolatey-licensed-issues#101

@tapika
Copy link
Author

tapika commented Oct 18, 2020

Please orchestrate in which order I will merge my changes, start from this ticket:

#2135

I've put now automatic process elevation as a pull request in, but you do understand that it's expensive for me to create for each pull request separate branch, so changes are not clued one on another. Easier would be that you tell me what to merge, I'll start from that one.

@TheCakeIsNaOH
Copy link
Member

Easier would be that you tell me what to merge, I'll start from that one.

I'm just a community member, so I don't know, but @ferventcoder would be able to give you more information/make a decision.

@ferventcoder
Copy link
Member

choco download is in Pro. We are unlikely to accept a change that would bring this to open source. If we decide for it to be there, we would bring down the code from Pro to FOSS.

@ferventcoder
Copy link
Member

And remember, commercial options are what help us offer the great free options and community service that we have. So while we appreciate you want to bring this to open source, we have to weigh that with keeping Chocolatey around long term and not competing with the commercial offerings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants