You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be good to have one kind field on bounds expressions instead of specialized kinds per type of bounds expressions. This would make it easier to write code that traverses bounds expressions. Currently, we have to test the type of a bounds expression and then look at the kind field.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue was copied from checkedc/checkedc-clang#50
It would be good to have one kind field on bounds expressions instead of specialized kinds per type of bounds expressions. This would make it easier to write code that traverses bounds expressions. Currently, we have to test the type of a bounds expression and then look at the kind field.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: