-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: misc typing #849
chore: misc typing #849
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #849 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 76.57% 76.57%
=======================================
Files 88 88
Lines 6994 6994
=======================================
Hits 5356 5356
Misses 1638 1638
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ | |||
"e2e-stage": "CXG_URL_BASE=https://cellxgene.staging.single-cell.czi.technology playwright test", | |||
"e2e-prod": "CXG_URL_BASE=https://cellxgene.cziscience.com playwright test", | |||
"fmt": "eslint --fix src __tests__", | |||
"lint": "eslint src __tests__ & npm run type-check", | |||
"lint": "eslint src __tests__ && npm run type-check", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this with &
only will run both commands in parallel. Is there a reason to make this sequential?
No description provided.