You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Quick question regarding the released data data/r2_compiled_anon.jsonl: it seems many entries have URLs only for claim["evidence"], rather than URL+ passage.
I was wondering if this means the evidence is inaccessible and the claim thus falls into the support=="N/A" category. But this does not seem to be always true after further inspection.
Evidence passages are necessary for model evaluation (please correct me if I am wrong). Could you share the best way to retrieve them for these URLs? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yumoxu
changed the title
Missing evidence text
Missing evidence passages
Jan 9, 2024
Hi @yumoxu , thanks for your interest! We added the file with all evidence passages at data/r2_compiled_all_evidences_autoais_anon.jsonl. Let us know if you have any more questions.
Hello authors, thank you for the great work!
Quick question regarding the released data
data/r2_compiled_anon.jsonl
: it seems many entries have URLs only forclaim["evidence"]
, rather than URL+ passage.I was wondering if this means the evidence is inaccessible and the claim thus falls into the support=="N/A" category. But this does not seem to be always true after further inspection.
Evidence passages are necessary for model evaluation (please correct me if I am wrong). Could you share the best way to retrieve them for these URLs? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: