We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Probably both the net and uart demos could have their gb_transport_backend_init() functions move to gb_xport_init().
net
uart
gb_transport_backend_init()
gb_xport_init()
It seems like the logical place for that and then we remove the gb_transport_backend_init() symbol altogether.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cfriedt
No branches or pull requests
Probably both the
net
anduart
demos could have theirgb_transport_backend_init()
functions move togb_xport_init()
.It seems like the logical place for that and then we remove the
gb_transport_backend_init()
symbol altogether.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: