Naming

[mbuchetics]

Ever thought of renaming this library? "nod.js" is so similar to "node.js" that it's very hard to find it on Google etc. even when using the correct name.

[casperin]

Yeah. Don't know what I was thinking. I basically just looked at synonyms for agreeing, and "nodding" popped up, and I really like the (nod) smiley on Skype. It's also not very descriptive.

The project is already added it to Bower under jquery-nod though (thans aggressivex!), so I don't know what's possible in terms of changing the name there?

[casperin]

bower/bower#120 Looks like it is possible.

[luishdez]

I agreed it's not the best name but I won't bother. there is not another jquery-nod but there is a lot of "jquery-validator…" and there are like zillions of libraries with similar names. The important thing is that the library is localizable easily. I've found you through github search https://github.com/search?p=2&q=jquery+validation&ref=cmdform&type=Repositories There are mentions in other webs also so I think is trivial, It will cause much more pain than benefits.

Although I would use constraints or assertions instead Metrics for the validation names in the docs.

[casperin]

Ooooh good stuff :-)

I'll just close this ticket then.. Next time I'll be more careful with naming. As for metrics vs constraints or options.... sure. Neither of them makes any sense to me :D Actually something like rules I think would be better. But yeah.. it's a minor thing.