We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Have you considered more explicit support for sub-commands? Specifically: having a recipe that could "chain" into a different justfile. So if I have
#.justfile sub = subcommand("/path/to/sub.justfile")
#sub.justfile foo_recipe: ....
I could execute just sub foo_recipe.
just sub foo_recipe
This supports modularization in some ways, and it could help organize multiple justfiles in a neat way.
It's pretty easy to simulate today:
sub subcmd *args: just -f /path/to/sub.justfile {{ subcmd }} {{ args }}
But you could imagine adding niceties on top: shell completion & help for the subcommand recipes, passing down variables etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Definitely! I want to do this via a module system, see #383 and #929.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Have you considered more explicit support for sub-commands? Specifically: having a recipe that could "chain" into a different justfile. So if I have
I could execute
just sub foo_recipe
.This supports modularization in some ways, and it could help organize multiple justfiles in a neat way.
It's pretty easy to simulate today:
But you could imagine adding niceties on top: shell completion & help for the subcommand recipes, passing down variables etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: