Chore: change SacRT copy to say "bus" instead of "light rail"

[angela-tran]

Part of #2505

There were 3 places I found that mentioned "light rail":

• "Get a reduced fare on SacRT light rail when you tap to ride" - agency index page
• "Cal-ITP doesn’t save any of your information. All SacRT transit benefits reduce fares by 50% for light rail." - eligibility index
• "You were not charged anything today. When boarding SacRT light rail, tap this card and you will be
  charged a reduced fare. You will need to re-enroll if you choose to change the card you use to pay for transit service." - enrollment success

For the Spanish translations, I did my best to map "bus" in for SacRT based on the copy for SBMTD. @lalver1 Maybe you can check my work to see if it makes sense to a Spanish speaker?

SBMTD entries in es/LC_MESSAGES/django.po are right below SacRT's entries, so you can compare them pretty easily.

[github-actions]

Coverage report

This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code.

[angela-tran]

Hmm, I'm not sure why the Django migration+messages check is failing... I did run ./bin/makemessages.sh and commit the changes. 🙁

edit: also when I run the commands that the workflow is running, I get the output that should make the workflow pass. ☹️

./bin/makemessages.sh
git add benefits
git diff --cached --shortstat

gives me

 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

[lalver1]

The translations look great @angela-tran!

[angela-tran]

Hmm, I'm not sure why the Django migration+messages check is failing... I did run ./bin/makemessages.sh and commit the changes. 🙁
...

~~never mind~~

I think this is due to how GitHub pull requests are technically running on a hidden branch that compares the base and target branches.

I am able to reproduce the failing check locally with these steps:

• Create a script at the project root-level containing what the check runs, call it check.sh:

./bin/makemessages.sh

set -x # show commands

git add benefits

# message files are up-to-date if the only differences are from the updated timestamp
if echo $(git diff --cached --shortstat) | grep -q '2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)';
then
  exit 0;
else
  exit 1;
fi

• Fetch the hidden branch into your repo as a local branch named troubleshoot-makemessages (or whatever you want):
  • git fetch origin pull/2507/head:troubleshoot-makemessages
• Check it out
  • git checkout troubleshoot-makemessages
• Run the script
  • ./check.sh

My output

calitp@7b79b09cfce6:/calitp/app$ ./check.sh 
processing locale en
processing locale es
++ git add benefits
++ grep -q '2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)'
+++ git diff --cached --shortstat
++ echo 2 files changed, 7 'insertions(+),' 5 'deletions(-)'
++ exit 1

These sources confirm that there is a "hidden branch" or whatever it is

• https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
• https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27567846/how-can-i-check-out-a-github-pull-request-with-git
• https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14947789/github-clone-from-pull-request

[angela-tran]

Ok, never mind. I'm not sure what state I was in before, but I just re-checked out chore/sacrt-copy-update, ran ./bin/makemessages.sh, and there were changes! Minor formatting things that don't actually change the copy. 🙄

Committed those, and the check should pass now. I don't think it had anything to do with the special /pull/2507 ref.

[lalver1]

Looks good! 👍