You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Standard migrations for model/field renames should maintain existing data
Data migration needed to move field data from old PaymentProcessor fields to new TransitAgency fields
Impact on analytics
The card_tokenize_url and card_tokenize_func fields are logged in analytics, and are not changed in this scope other than to be on a differently named model
thekaveman
added
chore
Chores and tasks for code cleanup, dev experience, etc.
back-end
Django views, sessions, middleware, models, migrations etc.
labels
Jul 23, 2024
Acceptance criteria
TransitProcessor
TransitAgency.payment_processor
field renamed toTransitAgency.transit_processor
transit_processor
client_id
moved toTransitAgency.transit_processor_client_id
client_secret_name
moved toTransitAgency.transit_processor_client_secret_name
audience
moved toTransitAgency.transit_processor_audience
Impact on the code
audience
in the repoclient_id
in the repoclient_secret
in the repopayment_processor
in the repoPaymentProcessor
in the repoImpact on existing data
PaymentProcessor
fields to newTransitAgency
fieldsImpact on analytics
card_tokenize_url
andcard_tokenize_func
fields are logged in analytics, and are not changed in this scope other than to be on a differently named modelEligibilityType.group_id
is logged in analytics using thepayment_group
event property. Model refactor:PaymentProcessor
Amplitude updates #2249 is a follow-up.Impact on Admin permissions
TransitAgencyAdmin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: