Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to get the correct range for all parameters #18

Open
xxlliu opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

How to get the correct range for all parameters #18

xxlliu opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@xxlliu
Copy link

xxlliu commented Mar 22, 2024

Dear author,
Hello! I'm confused about optimizing the parameter range, and I'm not sure if my parameter range is the right one. I would like to ask how I can get the correct range of all parameters.
Thank you for your time!

@cagrikymk
Copy link
Owner

Hello,
You can look at the example dataset files and examine the ranges given in the "params" files.
For example in line "2 1 1 0.1 1.7 2.6", first 3 values determine the parameter index: 2. group, 1. line, 1. value.
The fourth value is the parameter sensitivity which is ignored by JAX-ReaxFF as we rely on gradients to determine that.
The last 2 values determine the parameter range. These values change based on the atom types involved in the corresponding term in the functional form.

You can create your "params" file by examining these files. Unfortunately, I am not fully familiar with the widest ranges you can choose based on the functional form of the ReaxFF potential. I am planning to contact the developer of ReaxFF (Dr. Adri van Duin) to get more information about the parameters and some guiding ranges for each.

@xxlliu
Copy link
Author

xxlliu commented Mar 25, 2024

Thank you for your answer and look forward to your follow-up progress.

@xxlliu
Copy link
Author

xxlliu commented Sep 27, 2024

Dear author,
Hello! I'm so sorry to bother you again. Do you have any progress on this issue?
Thank you for your time!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants