You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Confusion:
a) As a funder (RedPotato) I invested 10, so how can I have a 20 payout without a worker to add in their 10 to make 20?
Note: Although the expired looks weird, after looking at several issues closer, I think it means that a worker did accept, but then tried to resell it but no-one bought it. Thus, the offer is expired.
Note2: Going into the issue shows that a solution was posted and correctly resolved (on the second try, the first one is missing a solution), which explains why the funder got the payout.
b) Why do some workers have ‘>’ on them? Is that that someone tried to resell them? But if that is the case, then why does the worker name not show up?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
a) Payout != Profit. In this situation, profit == 10. You're right there has to be a worker to add 10.
Note1: yes
b) > meant resell offer. Yeah we need to have a better convention for this - not sure what it should be.
Issue Source: http://github.com/bugmark-trial/trader1/issues/277
Confusion:
a) As a funder (RedPotato) I invested 10, so how can I have a 20 payout without a worker to add in their 10 to make 20?
Note: Although the expired looks weird, after looking at several issues closer, I think it means that a worker did accept, but then tried to resell it but no-one bought it. Thus, the offer is expired.
Note2: Going into the issue shows that a solution was posted and correctly resolved (on the second try, the first one is missing a solution), which explains why the funder got the payout.
b) Why do some workers have ‘>’ on them? Is that that someone tried to resell them? But if that is the case, then why does the worker name not show up?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: