Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to categorize multiple transactions at the same time #821

Closed
Computer9778 opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 9 comments
Closed

Ability to categorize multiple transactions at the same time #821

Computer9778 opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 9 comments
Labels
included in next release The work is done, it's just waiting to be released.

Comments

@Computer9778
Copy link

I import my qfx/csv file from the bank once a month. It would make life so much easier if i can then categorize multiple transactions in one go. For example i can see i have 20 transactions from starbucks. So if i could select all 20 of those and set the category to 'Coffee' in one go, that makes life so much easier. Currently i have to select each transaction individually and choose Coffee 20 times.

@IanNorris
Copy link

I'm looking to move from YNAB and I've pulled in a years worth of transactions from my bank. I'm now at multiple hours manually tagging transactions. This and auto categorization based on name are going to be blocking me from migrating.

@iffy
Copy link
Contributor

iffy commented Nov 17, 2022

Possible duplicate of #311

I understand the pain. After mobile apps, I'll try to prioritize this.

@arnholdsan
Copy link

I'm looking to move from YNAB and I've pulled in a years worth of transactions from my bank. I'm now at multiple hours manually tagging transactions. This and auto categorization based on name are going to be blocking me from migrating.

You can move from YNAB to Buckets and it takes into account all data from YNAB, hence no need to tag manually!

@Computer9778
Copy link
Author

I'm looking to move from YNAB and I've pulled in a years worth of transactions from my bank. I'm now at multiple hours manually tagging transactions. This and auto categorization based on name are going to be blocking me from migrating.

You can move from YNAB to Buckets and it takes into account all data from YNAB, hence no need to tag manually!

I brought over 3 years worth of data from YNAB and none of it was categorized with the YNAB data. Have no choice but to do the same as what @IanNorris mentioned

@IanNorris
Copy link

For visibility I decided to stick with YNAB4 for the time being. YNAB4 has its own issues but my main reason for moving off YNAB4 was because it was taking me too long, so doing additional manual steps would defeat the point in moving.

@iffy
Copy link
Contributor

iffy commented Dec 1, 2022

@Computer9778 and @IanNorris, I should have asked earlier: did you use the "Budget > Import From YNAB4..." or did you import from CSV?

@IanNorris
Copy link

IanNorris commented Dec 1, 2022

I actually tried both routes. When I initially imported from YNAB (which is an awesome feature btw). I found Buckets became unusably slow as a result. My YNAB has over 10 years of transactions in it - so we're talking probably 20-30k entries. The buckets file is about 4mb.

After that I started a new database and just imported a years worth, hoping to sort them quickly, but that was quickly dashed.

EDIT: I went back and tested it again and the perf was perfectly acceptable, I do remember it starting to get better, was a cache being built in the background? I'm going to go back and do a full import from the up to date YNAB4 budget (it took nearly an hour last time). I don't see myself giving it a proper shot until auto categorization is done, but that at least gives me some confidence in the long-term performance.

@iffy iffy added the included in next release The work is done, it's just waiting to be released. label Sep 18, 2024
@iffy
Copy link
Contributor

iffy commented Oct 3, 2024

Included in v0.77.0 release (AUTOMATED COMMENT)

@iffy iffy closed this as completed Oct 3, 2024
@Computer9778
Copy link
Author

Awesome! Been waiting for this. 🙌🏽

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
included in next release The work is done, it's just waiting to be released.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants