You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are fixing this issue with LLVM namespace conflicts by adding an optional "dwarf" feature, and testing in both configurations, but don't currently have a place to put a test of the underlying bug - that compiling with "dwarf" induces linker errors when also linking to llvm.
We'll need to dedicate a crate to this problem - link to both llvm and wasm-opt, with an optional dwarf feature; write a test case ... somewhere, that compiles in both configurations and confirms one fails and one succeeds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
re #154
We are fixing this issue with LLVM namespace conflicts by adding an optional "dwarf" feature, and testing in both configurations, but don't currently have a place to put a test of the underlying bug - that compiling with "dwarf" induces linker errors when also linking to llvm.
We'll need to dedicate a crate to this problem - link to both llvm and wasm-opt, with an optional dwarf feature; write a test case ... somewhere, that compiles in both configurations and confirms one fails and one succeeds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: