-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Detector Support]: Since update to version 0.13 Beta 1 seeing person everywhere #7849
Comments
There have been 0 changes to the model that would make things be detected as a false positive that weren't before. Most likely this is a case of the default motion settings just being overly sensitive for your camera and you should tune them. |
so getting the motion: xx to a lower setting will also reduce the detection of false positive objects? can you confirm what the default motion value is in the latest beta? "Default values have been changed for motion detection. If you have specific values set in your config, it is recommended to remove them and re-calibrate as necessary." |
I don't know what you mean by default motion value. There are multiple settings for motion detection outlined in https://deploy-preview-6262--frigate-docs.netlify.app/configuration/ Suggestion would be to watch the debug live view with object and motion boxes enabled and adjust settings as needed. |
You can follow #7850 |
"I don't know what you mean by default motion value" I was looking to try and see what changed in the defaults from the previous version to the new version. just to confirm my understanding. Even though I am talking about object detection here the motion detection sensitivity is still relevant correct? (i.e. it uses the motion first to determine that there is an object to identify) |
yes, it uses motion to know where to look for objects. So if motion detection is overly sensitive then frigate will look for objects more often which can lead to false positives. |
do you have an example of a person detection like that? |
seems like in that case a min_area filter should be used |
in this part of the config for example?
|
you'd likely want to do it for that particular camera only |
ok - i'll have to play with the settings per camera and report back. I'm seeing similar false alerts on about half of my cameras which prompted the question of what might have changed between 0.12 and 0.13. I didn't see many false positives previously. |
Looks like the exact same advice above would apply |
I'm also experiencing this in previously masked locations, looks like something might have changed with the mask behavior? Specific config below:
|
You aren't setting the detect resolution, and that has changed to now automatically detect your cameras resolution. You either need to redo your zones or you need to manually set the detect resolution to
|
I created new masks (after i changed the detect resolution) but i'm still seeing false positives. i'll continue to tweak them to see if i can resolve. To confirm i'm doing this right - here is an example camera with a mask
|
I think there is some confusion here, my previous reply was in response to the other user |
Agreed - but it sounds like we might be experiencing a similar issue with false positives since the upgrade I set the detect resolution globally
|
right but look at the above screenshot, the mask is now outside the frame of the camera because the detect resolution was not being set. So they are entirely different circumstances |
was confusing @robbo600 with @RiderCrazy Agree Robbo has a different error. RiderCrazy appears to be seeing a similar increase in false positives to me. |
Is that really the solution? As the size of that bounding box could also be the size of a person that is walking on the grass (front yard) using the min_area filter like that would probably filter those as well. I will try #7850 to see if that may improve the situation. Are these settings new or have they been changed? |
I have been gradually reducing the settings and then just letting it sit for a few hours - so far i haven't seen a major difference. |
I have also seen a dramatic uptick in false positives on my interior and exterior cameras - both in objects being detected as persons that simply aren't (a plastic bag, a lamp shade, a series of lights on the neighbor's house), but also misidentification of my cat or dog as a person frequently. Previous on 0.12 I had very few false positives. I have not yet had the opportunity to try adjusting settings as suggested, but I will give it a try this weekend. |
There were no changes to the models used, the only change in this area of detection is the minimum size of the region sent to object detection was reduced in hopes of making detection of smaller / further away objects better. It seems the default models have a greatly increased false positive rate due to this so I have put up #7883 to revert this change |
what would be the appropriate setting to put in the config to revert this back to the previous setting from 0.12 until the next version is released? |
there is none, this is not configurable behavior |
ah - thanks. Will watch for the next release. |
anyone seeing this issue and running docker can change the docker image to |
I just deployed - will report back if i am still having issues. Thanks |
closing this as users have confirmed elsewhere that this has been reduced. Feel free to create a new issue if something else comes up |
@NickM-27 Is this change present in 0.13.2 ? Or which version do I update to? thanks |
Describe the problem you are having
Since upgrading to version 0.13 Beta 1 many of my cameras are identifying the person object all over the place. Updates that in the previous version did not trigger an object detection are now triggering the person object over and over.
I've started to mask those areas of the cameras to prevent this but some of the items are moveable (like a cat toy it thinks is a person now). Do you have any suggestions for the best way to start to reduce these false positives?
Version
0.13.0 Beta 1
Frigate config file
docker-compose file or Docker CLI command
N/A
Relevant log output
Operating system
Other Linux
Install method
Docker Compose
Coral version
USB
Any other information that may be helpful
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: