-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
First update the formulae and Homebrew itself:
brew update
You can now find out what is outdated with:
brew outdated
Upgrade everything with:
brew upgrade
Or upgrade a specific formula with:
brew upgrade $FORMULA
If you installed to /usr/local then you can use the script in this
gist to uninstall — it will only
remove Homebrew and the stuff Homebrew installed leaving anything else
in /usr/local alone.
Provided you haven’t put anything else in Homebrew’s prefix
(brew --prefix), you can generally just rm -rf that directory. This
is because Homebrew won’t touch files outside its prefix.
If you do not uninstall all of the versions that Homebrew has installed,
Homebrew will continue to attempt to install the newest version it knows
about when you do (brew upgrade). This can be surprising.
To remove a formula entirely, you may do
(brew uninstall formula_name --force).
Be careful as this is a destructive operation and unfortunately, in
Homebrew 0.9.5 it seems that Homebrew does not support the --dry-run
option.
brew --cache
Which is usually: /Library/Caches/Homebrew
GUI apps on OS X don’t have /usr/local/bin in their PATH by default.
If you’re on Mountain Lion, you can fix this by running
launchctl setenv PATH "/usr/local/bin:$PATH". More details
here,
including how to set this across reboots. If you’re pre-Mountain Lion,
here’s an official
alternative.
See the Formula Cookbook.
Projects distribute source tarballs, generally, but if they provide a
good binary, we’ll use it. Though we don’t always, because Homebrew is
about homebrewing, it’s half the point that you can just
brew edit $FORMULA and change how the formula is compiled to your own
specification.
Homebrew does provide pre-compiled versions for some formulae. These pre-compiled versions are referred to as bottles and are available at: http://sf.net/projects/machomebrew/files.
If available, bottled binaries will be used by default except under the following conditions:
- Options were passed to the install command i.e.
brew install $FORMULAwill use a bottled version of $FORMULA, butbrew install$FORMULA —enable-bar` will trigger a source build. - The
-—build-from-sourceoption is invoked. - The environment variable
HOMEBREW_BUILD_FROM_SOURCEis set. - The machine is not running OS X 10.7+ as all bottled builds are generated on Lion or later.
- Homebrew is installed to a prefix other than the standard
/usr/local(although some bottles support this)
In order to completely disable bottled builds, simply add a value for
the environment variable HOMEBREW_BUILD_FROM_SOURCE to
your profile.
We aim to bottle everything.
brew install hub
brew update
cd $(brew --repository)
hub pull someone_else
Or:
brew install http://raw.github.com/user/repo/branch/formula.rb
Or:
brew pull http://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/pulls/1234
-
It’s easier
/usr/local/binis already in yourPATH. -
It’s easier
Tons of build scripts break if their dependencies aren’t in either/usror/usr/local. We fix this for Homebrew formulae (although we don’t always test for it), but you’ll find that many RubyGems and Python setup scripts break which is something outside our control. -
It’s safe
Apple has left this directory for us. Which means there is no/usr/localdirectory by default, so there is no need to worry about messing up existing tools.
If you plan to install gems that depend on
brews then save yourself a bunch of hassle and install to
/usr/local!
It is not trivial to tell gem to look in non-standard directories for headers and dylibs. If you choose /usr/local, everything “just works)”
tl;dr Sudo is dangerous, and you installed TextMate.app without sudo anyway.
Homebrew is designed to work without using sudo. You can decide to use it but we strongly recommend not to do so. If you have used sudo and run into a bug then it is likely to be the cause. Please don’t file a bug report unless you can reproduce it after reinstalling Homebrew from scratch without using sudo.
You should only ever sudo a tool you trust. Of course, you can trust Homebrew ;) But do you trust the multi-megabyte Makefile that Homebrew runs? Developers often understand C++ far better than they understand make syntax. It’s too high a risk to sudo such stuff. It could break your base system, or alter it subtly.
And indeed, we’ve seen some build scripts try to modify
/usr even when the prefix was specified as something else
entirely.
Did you chown root /Applications/TextMate.app? Probably
not. So is it that important to chown root wget?
If you need to run Homebrew in a multi-user environment, consider creating a separate user account especially for use of Homebrew.
If it’s not in man brew, it’s probably an external command. These are documented here.
If it’s been a while, bump it with a “bump” comment. Sometimes we miss requests and there are plenty of them. Maybe we were thinking on something. It will encourage consideration. In the meantime if you could rebase the pull request so that it can be cherry-picked more easily we will love you for a long time.
Yes! It’s easy! Just brew edit $FORMULA. You don’t have to submit modifications back toHomebrew/homebrew, just edit the formula as you personally need it and brew install. As a bonus brew update will merge your changes with upstream so you can still keep the formula up-to-date with your personal modifications!
Yes! It’s easy! Just brew create URL Homebrew will then open the
formula in $EDITOR so you can edit it, but it probably already
installs, try it: brew install $FORMULA. If you come up any issues,
run the command with the -d switch like so: brew install -d $FORMULA
which drops you into a debugging shell.
If you want your new formula to be part of Homebrew/homebrew or want to learn more about writing formula then please read the Formula Cookbook.
Yes, brew is designed to not get in your way so you can use it how you like.
Install your own stuff, but be aware that if you install common
libraries, like libexpat yourself, it may cause trouble when trying to
build certain Homebrew formula. As a result brew doctor will warn you
about this.
Thus it’s probably better to install your own stuff to the Cellar and
then brew link it. Like so:
$ cd foo-0.1
$ brew diy
./configure —prefix=/usr/local/Cellar/foo/0.1
$ ./configure —prefix=/usr/local/Cellar/foo/0.1
[snip]
$ make && make install
$ brew link foo
Linking /usr/local/Cellar/foo/0.1… 17 symlinks createdUse brew log $FORMULA to find out!
Sometimes formula are moved to specialized repositories. These are the likely candidates:
- https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-dupes
- https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-versions
- https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-games
You can use brew tap to access these formulae:
brew tap homebrew/games
brew install …Note that brew search still finds formula in taps.
mxcl was too concerned with the beer theme and didn’t consider that the project may actually prove popular. By the time he realized it was too late. However, today, the first google hit for “homebrew” is not beer related ;-)
It means the formula is installed only into the Cellar, it is not linked
into /usr/local. This means most tools will not find it. We don’t do
this for stupid reasons. You can link the formula in still if you need
to with brew link.
brew edit $FORMULA and edit the formula. Currently there is no
other way to do this, but we’ll design something like that into brew2.