[Content] Review of technology pages and accuracy of their content

[dls-cipher]

@iamredbar

Introduction: Currently 10 technology pages are listed on the bitshares.org live website. Content was rewritten with facts as they are, with few paragraphs being removed and few keywords changed in the content in order to keep proper focus on SEO.

The problem: Content management was done by @rsswlkr as he has in his portfolio a lot of content creation, but he (as many of us here, still) lack on proper technical knowledge on details (e.g. finality, proper crypto/tech terminology, etc. ) as any other associate that was working on the content.

Task: You need to review entire content and mark out all irregular/non-truthful statements from technical perspective and once you have all done - verify them via telegram with BitSharesDEV's or anyone else (if here there is not much activity).

You can spend between 15 and 45 minutes per page doing review (max, some pages have very small amount of content).

Budget: 50bitUSD/h offered for this task.

Reporting has to be done with screenshots, markers, comments/bullets and documented/stored for review on google drive.

Hours/review has to be tracked with TopTracker.

REPLY TO CONFIRM otherwise its going to bounty.

Any questions, shoot here or buzz me in Telegram (if here not responding/urgent)

[iamredbar]

I can do this.

[dls-cipher]

I can do this.

Ill be sending invite for bitshares.org repo and TopTracker BitShares.org project (have your email from infra worker).

Chee®s and thanks.

[grctest]

#111 updated the smartcoin page