Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Find suitable descriptive names for different collection types #1033

Open
sunkup opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Find suitable descriptive names for different collection types #1033

sunkup opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@sunkup
Labels
refactoring Internal improvement of existing functions

Comments

@sunkup
Copy link
Member

sunkup commented Sep 19, 2024

As of right now we have the naming conventions of

  • "local collections" for collections storing the actual contents in the content providers. Thats is: LocalCollection, LocalCalendar, LocalJtxCollection, LocalTaskList, LocalAddressBook
  • "DB collections" for representing remote collections stored in the database.
  • ... the actual remote collection saved on the server

The naming is ambigous and somehow confusing. We should think of some new names, rename the classes and update the KDoc.
@sunkup sunkup added the refactoring Internal improvement of existing functions label Sep 19, 2024
@rfc2822
Copy link
Member

rfc2822 commented Dec 23, 2024

Do you have suggestions? Or is it not applicable anymore?

Maybe we can add documentation somewhere to make it more clear?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sunkup sunkup

Labels
refactoring Internal improvement of existing functions
Projects
DAVx⁵ Releases
Status: Todo
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rfc2822 @sunkup