Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fee reimbursement for trade 99999 #89

Closed
cbeams opened this issue Mar 22, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Fee reimbursement for trade 99999 #89

cbeams opened this issue Mar 22, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor

cbeams commented Mar 22, 2018

This trade failed due to a timeout. Any lost fees will be reimbursed.

image

@keo-bisq this was your trade. Could you (or the buyer, if you're reading this) please paste the text values of the maker and taker fee transaction IDs shown in the screenshot above? I'll process this in the next batch reimbursement at #76.

@cbeams cbeams self-assigned this Mar 22, 2018
@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Apr 19, 2018

Closing as reimbursed via the batch transaction documented at #76 (comment).

@cbeams cbeams closed this as completed Apr 19, 2018
@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Apr 19, 2018

Re-opening, as this was accidentally closed. Needs further input from @keo-bisq per comments above.

@cbeams cbeams reopened this Apr 19, 2018
@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Apr 20, 2018

Oops, just realized this was actually my trade after all.

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Apr 20, 2018

image

Maker: 5440b8235109632ccf05471432f41812e649e106150d89b35d1cfb0716d24b70
Taker: ebbfc84a025a2d9523dacb2fe57d3bd2b9a9832164ee0cde87420d7f5a2b72c5
Deposit: 9614b7076e754d3f68db81ab9799f3f0e41619082a8e1ea416c8081cd93d8f17

@cbeams
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbeams commented Oct 19, 2018

Closing as invalid. All transactions above were broadcast and valid, and the deposit tx led to a valid payout tx. There was apparently a timeout error, as shown in the original screenshot at top, but it appears that this trade settled normally in the end. If either trader is subscribed to this issue and has evidence otherwise that fees for this transaction should in fact be reimbursed, please speak up and I'll reopen as necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants