You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I’m currently working with the Master of Pores 2 to detect RNA modifications. In my analysis, I need to determine which of the two samples being compared has an enrichment of modified RNA at position X.
However, in the final output, I only receive information about differences at the supported k-mer positions. In epinano does indicate the enrichment trend toward a specific sample, but I haven’t found such an indication in nanoconsensus or nanoposish/compore.
Have you encountered this issue before or found a way to extract sample specific enrichment information?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As you mention, NanoConsensus and Nanocompore only give qualitative information (ie: which regions are differentially modified between samples) and they do not give information regarding the directionality of the change.
To obtain this information, you should either:
Option 1 (recommended): look at epinano summed errors
Option 2: check the results of tombo msc - they contain information about % methylated reads per position - and therefore, it could give you an idea of the directionality.
Hi, I’m currently working with the Master of Pores 2 to detect RNA modifications. In my analysis, I need to determine which of the two samples being compared has an enrichment of modified RNA at position X.
However, in the final output, I only receive information about differences at the supported k-mer positions. In epinano does indicate the enrichment trend toward a specific sample, but I haven’t found such an indication in nanoconsensus or nanoposish/compore.
Have you encountered this issue before or found a way to extract sample specific enrichment information?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: